India has issued a consultation opinion that technology companies have obtained government permission before launching a new model, thereby involving debates about global artificial intelligence supervision.The Indian Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology issued this proposal on Friday.This consultation opinion has not been announced in the public field, and it also requires technology companies to ensure that their services or products are "not allowed to prejudice or discriminate, or threatened the fairness of the election process."
Although the Indian Information Technology Department acknowledged that the notice was not legal binding, the Deputy Minister of Information Technology of India, Rajeev Chandrasekhar, said that the notice "shows that this is the future of supervision."He added: "This is a suggestion to ask you to follow."
The ministry quoted the power given by the 2000 "Information Technology Law" and 2021 "Information Technology Rules".The ministry requested "take effect immediately" and requires technology companies to submit the "Action and Status Report" to the ministry within 15 days.
The new consultation opinion also requires technology companies to "properly" marked the output generated by its artificial intelligence model "may be with inherent errors or unreliable", which marks India that has reversed an indifferent attitude towards artificial intelligence supervision.Less than a year ago, the Indian Ministry of Science and Technology refused to supervise the development of artificial intelligence, but believed that the industry was crucial to India’s strategic interests.Kanpur Stock
This move in India surprised many industry executives.Many Indian start -ups and venture capital companies said they were scared by new consultation opinions and believed that this regulatory would hinder India’s ability in global competition, and India has lagged behind in global competition.
The founder of the startup Kisan AI Pratik Desai, Pratik Desai, wrote: "I’m really a fool, thinking that I will bring Genai to Indian agriculture from San Francisco.And excited about this. After 4 years of full -time work, artificial intelligence was introduced into India’s field. This is terrible and the enthusiasm of people.Mumbai Wealth Management
Many Silicon Valley leaders have also criticized India’s policy transformation.Perplexity AI, the co-founder and chief executive of Perplexity AI, one of the hottest artificial intelligence startups, Aravind Srinivas, said New Delhi’s new suggestion was "India’s error move".Kolkata Stocks
Martin Casado, partner of the venture capital company Andreessen Horowitz, said, "True he is a ghost, it is really a big ghost."
Earlier, Chandraseka disappointed with Google Gemini’s response last month.Last month, a user asked whether Gemini (previously known as "Bard") Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi was a fascist.
In response, Gemini quoted his experts who did not disclose his identity as saying that Modi was accused of implementing some fascist policies.In this regard, Chandlaseka warned Google that this response "directly violated" the "2021 Information Technology Rules" and "Criminal Classics".New Delhi Investment
Consultation added that the provisions of the "Information Technology Law" and "Information Technology Rules" will lead to "intermediaries or platforms or users may be punished after being recognized."Agra Wealth Management
New Delhi Investment
